# Training Services Financial Model

## Purpose

This document turns the current training thesis into a working financial model for IPC delivery, train-the-trainer activity, and Clark Courses.

It is intended to be tight enough for planning and partner conversations, but still evolvable as real pricing, utilization, and instructor constraints become clearer.

## Model Scope

This model covers:

- IPC certification delivery in Hamilton
- train-the-trainer activity
- Clark Courses public and private cohort delivery
- the Niagara Assembly host-facility fee structure

It does not yet model:

- fully scaled curriculum licensing economics
- online Foundations delivery economics
- multi-site training expansion beyond Hamilton

## Core Assumptions

The current working assumptions are:

- Year 1 average class size: 8 students
- Year 2 average class size: 9 students
- Year 1 blended revenue per student: CAD 1,100 conservative, CAD 1,200 base, CAD 1,350 optimistic
- Year 2 blended revenue per student: CAD 1,150 conservative, CAD 1,300 base, CAD 1,500 optimistic
- Year 1 direct instructional cost rate: about 55%
- Year 2 direct instructional cost rate: about 52%

These assumptions come from the supporting market-sizing memo and should be updated only when real cohort performance provides better data.

## Niagara Assembly Host-Facility Cost Model

The current Hamilton host-facility structure is:

- `1–2 courses/month`: CAD 1,250 fixed monthly fee plus 12% of contribution margin after direct instructional costs
- `3–4 courses/month`: CAD 2,500 fixed monthly fee plus 10% of contribution margin after direct instructional costs
- `5+ courses/month`: CAD 4,000 fixed monthly fee plus 8% of contribution margin after direct instructional costs

Direct instructional costs should include:

- instructor compensation
- instructor travel and lodging where required
- course-specific consumables and training materials
- third-party certification or course-delivery fees tied directly to the class

General CLARK overhead should remain outside the revenue-share base.

## Year 1 Scenarios

| Metric | Conservative | Base | Optimistic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Courses delivered | 14 | 22 | 34 |
| Average students per class | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| Total student-events | 112 | 176 | 306 |
| Gross revenue | CAD 123,200 | CAD 211,200 | CAD 413,100 |
| Direct instructional costs | CAD 67,760 | CAD 116,160 | CAD 227,205 |
| Contribution after direct costs | CAD 55,440 | CAD 95,040 | CAD 185,895 |
| Niagara fixed fee | CAD 8,750 | CAD 23,000 | CAD 33,000 |
| Niagara rev-share | CAD 5,544 | CAD 9,504 | CAD 14,872 |
| Net CLARK contribution | CAD 41,146 | CAD 62,536 | CAD 138,023 |

## Year 2 Scenarios

Year 2 assumes a more meaningful CIT mix and a larger Clark Courses contribution.

| Metric | Conservative | Base | Optimistic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IPC courses | 18 | 28 | 40 |
| CIT courses | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Clark Course modules | 4 | 8 | 14 |
| Total courses and modules | 24 | 40 | 60 |
| Total student-events | 190 | 330 | 540 |
| Gross revenue | CAD 218,500 | CAD 429,000 | CAD 810,000 |
| Direct costs | CAD 113,620 | CAD 223,080 | CAD 421,200 |
| Contribution after direct costs | CAD 104,880 | CAD 205,920 | CAD 388,800 |
| Niagara fixed fee | CAD 27,500 | CAD 40,000 | CAD 48,000 |
| Niagara rev-share | CAD 10,488 | CAD 20,592 | CAD 31,104 |
| Net CLARK contribution | CAD 66,892 | CAD 145,328 | CAD 309,696 |

## Break-Even View

The current break-even floor is practical rather than heroic.

- Minimum students per month: about 12 to 16
- Minimum courses per month: about 2 courses of 8 students
- Estimated monthly fixed costs to cover: about CAD 8,738
- Base-case break-even revenue: about CAD 17,600 gross monthly

Working conclusion:

- training services can reach direct operating break-even quickly if CLARK sustains roughly two courses per month
- the biggest operational risk is instructor readiness and delivery capacity, not the fee model itself

## Revenue Mix Priorities

The current priority order should be:

1. IPC CIS and adjacent early-volume courses
2. CIT and train-the-trainer activity because of higher value and multiplier effects
3. Clark Courses public and private cohorts
4. later curriculum licensing and partner delivery

## Pricing Architecture

The current pricing logic should remain simple.

- IPC and certification-linked delivery: market-priced against the existing certification ecosystem
- Clark Courses public cohorts: accessible but professional pricing, especially at Foundations level
- Clark Courses private cohorts: premium delivery priced by cohort or delivery day
- later curriculum licensing: annual license plus instructor enablement and update support

## Planning Implications

- Year 1 planning should optimize for course fill rate, instructor readiness, and repeatable delivery rather than maximum revenue extraction
- Year 2 planning should optimize for mix improvement, especially CIT and Clark Courses
- Clark Courses likely carries the strongest long-term margin profile once curriculum-development cost is amortized

## Operating Gates

The training-services line should be considered healthy only if:

- monthly delivery stays at or above the 2-course break-even floor
- instructor coverage is stable enough to avoid cancellation risk
- Clark Courses begins contributing revenue rather than remaining purely curricular
- Niagara facility economics remain administratively simple

## What Still Needs Validation

- final seat pricing by course family
- private cohort pricing by delivery day and location
- curriculum licensing fee structure
- instructor utilization assumptions
- conversion rate from Clark Courses into IPC pathways and vice versa

## Current Recommendation

Use the Year 1 base case as the default working plan.

That means planning around:

- about 22 courses delivered in Year 1
- about CAD 211,200 in gross revenue
- about CAD 62,536 in net CLARK contribution after direct instructional costs and Niagara facility participation

The target is not merely to hit those numbers. The target is to prove a training model that is commercially credible, repeatable, and licensable.
